1 out of 5 stars
I'm sorry, but I just have to throw in the towel. I gave it the ol'
college try (which is a phrase I've used before, but this time is apt as
I'm actually going to college; part-time, true, but it counts and...
I'm babbling, so I'll be moving on). I gave myself until 150 pages for
the story to finally get good and capture my attention/imagination, but
it never happened. One hundred and fifty pages in, I put the book down
and almost sobbed with happiness because I didn't have to keep trying
anymore.
The author obviously did her research. There's a great
deal of historical detail: cultural, military, religious, geographical.
And it's done in a way which doesn't beat you over the head in a "look
at me and all the research I did!" sort of way. Yet, for all that, it
didn't capture me or immerse me in either the setting, the story, or the
characters. Writing about a culture completely foreign to me, as a
reader, it stayed foreign and didn't connect with me even on a basic
human level. As I read, I couldn't help but keep thinking about Conn Iggulden's
masterful Genghis series and compare his writing to Lapierre's. Both
stories deal with cultures completely foreign to Western lifestyles and
mores, Iggulden's with the Mongol empire of the late 12th and early 13th
centuries, Lapierre's with the Muslim tribes of early 19th century
Chechnya; both stories are well researched. Yet Iggulden's, even with
its foreign subject and the sometimes off-putting actions from the
characters, actions which go against Western standards of appropriate
behavior, pulled me in to such a degree that I barely noticed the
differences between his characters and myself; I felt what they felt, I
ached when they ached, I exulted when they exulted. I was in the
story. Not so with Lapierre's novel. Her characters were simply names
on a page; their actions frustrated, disgusted, and baffled me and I
didn't understand their motivations at all. They remained decidedly and
defiantly foreign.
But what really pissed me off about
Lapierre's book was the fact that, even 150 pages in (one-third of the
book), we hadn't even started on the main story. Supposedly the novel
is about the real-life story of Jamal Eddin, the son of Imam Shamil, who
was provided as a hostage to the Russian empire in order to seal a
truce of peace between the two warring nations. Jamal, a young boy when
he's "adopted" by Czar Nicholas I, grows up in the glittering imperial
court and though he maintains his Muslim faith, he becomes an
accomplished courtier. However, his faith becomes a problem when he
falls in love with Elizaveta Petrovna Olenina, a beautiful Russian
aristocrat; in order to marry her, he must convert to Christianity, a
move he's willing to make. Until he's called back to his homeland, to
his Muslim faith and rightful place as leader, and he must decide: Love
or Honor. (Hence the title, see?) Sounds fabulously dramatic and
romantic, yet at 150 pages in, we've only just gotten to the point where
Jamal's father decides to give in to Russia's demands and send Jamal to
them as a hostage. That's one-third of the book gone and we haven't
even gotten to Russia yet? As Charlie Brown would say, Good grief!
That certainly doesn't leave a lot of time to watch Jamal grow up in the
imperial court, which should account for several years, not to mention
the development of the romance between Jamal and Elizaveta or the final
act to their story. Now, I can see spending some time in Jamal's
childhood, setting his character up; I could totally get on board with
that treatment. If only that had occurred. Instead, during all the
time spent in Jamal's childhood, we really only see his father, Imam Shamil, and his father's actions: Shamil's quest to become the holiest
of holy men, Shamil in his holy war to cleanse the world of every single
Russian, Shamil as he rids the tribes of all traitors by systematically
slaughtering all those who push for peace between Chechnya and Russian,
even if that means eliminating entire villages, women and children
included. Hell, the man even has his elderly mother whipped for acting
as mediator in a push for compromise, because "Allah" told him so.
Jerk-off. Not a character to inspire any kind of sympathy in me. So,
anyway, it's all Shamil with just a little bit of Jamal sprinkled in.
It's very frustrating, not to mention a very questionable move on the
author's part. If it were me, I'd show Jamal's childhood from his
P.O.V. and only a little bit at that; just enough to set up the
situation and his abduction to Russia. Later, as an adult, during
dramatic moments, Jamal could flashback to his childhood memories and
follow his father's example or avoid his father's mistakes.
Stylist
choices aside, this novel, what I read of it, bored me to tears and
didn't inspire me to invest any emotions in either the characters or
story. Which is a shame, because I heard such great things about
Alexandra Lapierre and was really looking forward to immersing myself in
what promised to be an exciting and romantic novel. A promise which
went unfulfilled.
Read July 2-August 1, 2012
Originally reviewed for the Amazon Vine Program August 2, 2012
Books like this are always tough, you either really get sucked in, or you don't. Sorry that you didn't enjoy this book.
ReplyDeleteI like historical fiction, but, you're right, it has to suck me in. And when the story hasn't even really begun, a third of the way in, I get very frustrated and even less inclined to like the book.
Delete